New Zealand Journal of Forestry (2015) 59(4): 32–42
©New Zealand Institute of Forestry

Professional Paper
Should detailed terrain stability or erosion susceptibility mapping be mandatory in erodible steep lands?

Michael Marden ^*,1, Les Basher ², Chris Phillips ³ and Robin Black <sup>4

1</sup> Research Scientist, Landcare Research NZ Ltd Email: mardenm@landcareresearch.co.nz
² Research Scientist, Landcare Research NZ Ltd
³ Research Scientist, Landcare Research NZ Ltd
⁴ Environmental Planner, Hancock Forest Management
^*Corresponding author.

Abstract: In 2012 an opinion piece in this journal on plantation forest harvesting and landscape response advocated a need to better manage the risk of high intensity, low frequency storms during the most vulnerable post-harvest period. With the expectation that there will be more storm damaging events associated with exotic forests we question: - Whether sufficient resources are being directed towards identifying on-site and off-site values at risk, with a view to better management of adverse environmental effects of forest practices - Whether more detailed mapping of terrain stability or erosion susceptibility, together with a risk analysis approach, would enable better preventative management at operational level rather than relying on corrective action as at present - And, if so, could the Erosion Susceptibility Classification (ESC) developed for the National Environmental Standard (NES) for plantation forestry be used to decide if a reconnaissance-level or detailed-level of terrain stability mapping is required. In posing these questions we provide a brief review of the international experience in assessing storm damage, re-introduce the concept of terrain stability mapping, promote the potential role of new technology in identifying site-specific areas susceptible to storm damage, and conclude with some recommendations.
(no keywords)